Nestle Malaysia performance appraisal
1.0 Introduction
Nestle Malaysia is among the best performing companies on the stock exchange market as indicated in last year’s report published by Bursa Malaysia (Bursa, 2019). The food and beverage company has thrived in the local market since its establishment in 1912 as a company dealing with powdered milk (Nestle.com, 2020). The company has expanded its trade in the food and beverage sector to come up with beverage drinks such as Nescafe, Milo, and currently infant milk which is the loved by parents with kids. Foods such as Maggi, Kit Kat, and Noodles are common on the Malaysian household recipes. Nestle Malaysia is a subsidiary of the giant Nestle corporate company that currently operates over 80 countries worldwide. Due to availability of efficient sourcing in the Malaysian branch, the company has grown to a major contributor to the country’s GDP with an operating revenue of RM5.52 billion in 2019 (Nestle.com, 2020). With the situational leadership in combination with the affiliates, the Malaysian subsidiary under the leadership of the CEO Juan Aranols looks forwards to sail through the tough economic times the looming Covid pandemic and come back stronger (Nestle.com, 2020).
2.0 Effectiveness of Performance Appraisal
Performance appraisal is the evaluations of the company’s employees’ performance in terms of their skills, performance, and their weaknesses. Nestle Malaysia performs its financial appraisal annual to see the progress of the company by employees performance. Employees play a central part in the success of any company and are at times termed as the “company’s assets” as they directly dictate the financial performance of the company (Pattanayak, 2020). This has made Nestle Malaysia to invest heavily in the human resources by recruitment of high profile experts, good employee benefits, and proper training of its employees (Nestle.com, 2020). The high expenditures on the employees has to be recovered by exceptional performance in the production chain to keep the profits high. This is why there is high needs to check on performance appraisal to see where to improve. More so, Nestle Malaysia has been using the performance appraisal to award bonuses and dismissal of the underperforming employees. From the effective appraisal of its employees, there are effectiveness that can be identified from it.
Performance appraisal has improved communication effectiveness at Nestle Malaysia. The performance appraisal cycle has been giving the company important experiences about its employees. The key is to discuss transparently with the staff previously, during and after the survey. Short of what 33% of the workers’ state they generally know how they perform at work, as indicated in the Forbes report. Through appraisal, the organization has been able to present its desires to employees. More so, the workers have been free to discuss and with their superiors in which their representation has been ineffective. The company has been able to communicate effectively about the goal and various clues on which how employees can improve their performance to accomplish the goal of the company. A staff who accepts that all is great won’t get the opportunity to address an issue. This sort of circumstance can prompt dissatisfaction, lessened efficiency, helpless resolve and disdain. Appraisal evaluations has helped fortify the bonds within Nestle employees. They decrease vulnerability as well as permit the organization to set key objectives for them and address conduct issues in their early phases. Also, workers have been getting the opportunity to communicate their interests and examine their preparation and improvement needs. They likewise realize what is anticipated from them and how their presentation is assessed. Generally, Nestle Malaysia has been an active player in performance appraisal and has achieved an effective bond of communication between the management and its staff.
Through performance appraisal, the organization has been able to award the top performers. The key reason for assessing the performance of the workers is to recognize workers’ qualities and shortcomings. Nestle managers have been utilizing this data to figure out who has contributed the most to the organization’s development and prize top workers. Thusly, employee’s assessments may frame the premise of legitimacy based remuneration designs that let the firm identify its best individuals and know how much the association esteems them. The awarding helps the firm to quickly achieve its objective through the hardworking employees. Normal errors, for example, finishing the examination without having quantifiable objectives, can influence the nature of the outcomes. This has made the company to have clear objectives in order for it to achieve better results that will help it improve its performance. That is the reason it’s essential to accumulate information from numerous sources and set clear desires for every job. The Nestle company has proper directions on this and it is clear that the appraisal supervisors to give required score and not to exaggerate them. Awarding the best individuals with high scores motivates them to work even to retain the award or even win a better one. When the workers are given the scores and awarded in accordance to their performance, and they are genuine, there is effectiveness in the award process as it will have no complains.
The appraisal plan for Nestle Malaysia has been effective enough in backing professional development of its staff. The appraisal processes have been used to uncover open doors for development and assist the managers with distinguishing the preparation needs of their staff, prompting a more gainful association. They likewise permit the firm to spot possible experts and decide when they are prepared to assume on more noteworthy liability. Furthermore, the process has helped the organization to put resources into staff improvement so that it can improve them and stay with them for a longer periods of time. Training the staff for example has improved the professionalism in the employee’s performance and they are convinced to stay longer. Having low performing workers is likely to increase a lot of costs in maintaining them or they are likely to cost the company due to poor performance. More so, performance appraisal has helped to reduce staff dismissal cases. More incessant casual gatherings are supplanting the conventional assessment measure. This methodology seems, by all accounts, to be more compelling at helping individuals build up their aptitudes and abilities. The Society for HRM suggests estimating workers’ presentation against their objectives and giving continuous training. Besides, the process has helped the workers to identify their key potentials and weaknesses which have has helped them to improve as they work on their weaknesses while maintain their strength. The experiences picked up during execution surveys have been permitting the firm to delineate a lifelong way for its staff and adequately allot preparing assets.
Performance appraisal by Nestle Malaysia has not only improved the performance of the company, but has also improved the morale of the staff. While the facts confirm that most workers fear performance appraisal, these assessments can fill in as a persuasive device. Legitimacy based rewards, advancements, preparing programs, and different results of execution surveys improves camaraderie. Applauding colleagues for their achievements is similarly as significant by the company. The company has been urging the workers to improve, and has been offering explicit strides for their development. The company has zeroed in on the positive and tells the staff group the best way to expand on those qualities. However, it is the responsibility of the assessing supervisors to be careful of with their speech during the assessment process, as they are likely to lose inspiration in case of abusive talks on them. The Nestle appraisal supervisors zero in on giving helpful criticism, paying little mind to a worker’s exhibition. The firm has improved in its effectiveness in energizing its employees to improve by requesting them opinions and comparing them with assessment results to come up with proper performance. This has generally improved the effectiveness in improving employee performance capacities by progression units and preparations of programs.
The three types of appraisal tools
Management by Objectives (MBO)
In this type of techniques, both the managers, appraisal supervisors are involved in the developmental of a clear plan that is helpful for the appraisal process. The team sets up appraisal objectives that are useful as part of the strategies to obtain organizational goals. The discussions are crucial as the team’s believe each of the representatives understands their overall behaviors and it will be of important is they are included in the process at the earlier stages (Islami, Mulolli & Mustafa, 2018). The appraisal objectives are used to achieve the firms overarching objectives by the use of the SMART method in which the objectives set are specific, Measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-sensitive. These objectives are set in the beginning of another annual year and at any quarter, half, or at the end of the year the objectives are compared with the actual results. The results are then used to either award, give transfers, or giving the employees further training so as to have better results in the next assessment. The importance of this technique is that it lays pressure on the workers to give maximum output of their potential by utilizing their tangible attributes such as skills and intangible ones such as commitments.
The uniqueness of this method is how the stakeholders are actively involved in it from the beginning to the end. The targets are set by the teams and they are the same people monitoring each other’s progress (Ashfaq, 2019). This helps in high commitment as everyone will want to meet the targets set earlier on and have a better performance image. More so, this technique is important in gathering both qualitative and quantitative data for the senior positions of management like the managing directors and the executives.
The rating scale technique
This is also a commonly used technique by appraisal managers. The managers comes up with a scale of rating with different colors that have different score lines. The score also represent the performance of the employees in different aspects of their duties. The managers the awards each employee with his/her scores. The difference of this method from the others is that the employees need to clearly understand different scores and their respective ratings. For example, a score of three out of five the employee might consider it as an average performance but the managers might take it as above satisfactory (Sahni, 2019). Therefore the technique has to be more careful with the rating and clarity is made up. Most of the people who are used in the developmental process are the managers as they have more knowledge on what attributes they look at on the employees. Even though other techniques also have essential key requirements, this technique should be based on the key metrics that re required in the assessment and it is essential for the managers to avoid setting up the rating scale according to their personal opinions. This temptation occurs in most of the processes and it is therefore recommendable to have a more clear process that is focused on the overall performance measures form the employees. In most of the cases, the rating is allowed to be set up with senior management that rarely interacts with the workers but clearly understands the objectives of the company. The neutral top management will be balanced, and biasness in award of ratings according to personal opinions will not be seen. Furthermore, the rating scale is shared with the employees during their annual performance in bits so as for them to remain focused and improve on their scores if they are low.
The 360 Degree Feedback Technique
In this technique, the employee receives feedback on his or her performance from the people around. Assessment answers from people such as the managers, peers, co-workers, customers, and even reports. The method tries to include all the aspects surrounding the employee. The people surrounding the employee gives feedback on the effectiveness of his or her performance at work. This technique is more so based on the behavioral techniques the people around can see. This technique is different from the other forms of appraisal as the method tries to include and exhaust all the assessment channels of the employee leaving no avenue for any loophole. The feedbacks are then used as a motivations and challenges highlighted for a better performance. 360 degree input has clearly a few critical reasons over single-evaluated criticism techniques. As opposed to depending on the recognitions or criticism of single person, the multi-evaluated criticism gets different observations from various points which bring a more extensive outline of a representative’s presentation. Those working with the representative, alongside the boss are for the most part give a more extensive image of a worker’s conduct or execution particularly when the chief doesn’t have the occasion to regulate all territories of a worker’s execution (Hosain, 2016). Demonstrating data to chiefs about how they are seen by direct subordinates, friends and customers can pick up as much fair criticism as is important than an individual self-recognition. A subsequent elective reason for the selection of 360 degree input is the craving to grow formal examination measure by making such criticism more evaluative, connecting it legitimately to the supervisors assessment. One later experience recommends that there are weights to make 360 degree criticisms evaluative as organizations need to get more to their ventures’ worth (Kanaslan & Iyem, 2016). As per Hosain (2016), 360 degree input is one of the most remarkable systems in the field of execution examination measure. It includes authenticity, unwavering quality and obligation in generally measure (Kanaslan & Iyem, 2016). Kanaslan and Iyem (2016) propose further that 360 degree criticism can be a ground-breaking hierarchical intercession to expand attention to the significance of adjusting conduct, work unit execution and client desires; just as expanding support in initiative turn of events and work viability. They too expressed that it perceives the intricacy of the executives and the estimation of contribution from different sources.
Recommendations strategies
A good strategy underscores the way that presentation improvement is reliant upon sound HR rehearses, reasonable evaluation rehearses, successful execution the board, what’s more, a consciousness of an association’s general key objectives. In any case, there are likewise a number of suggestions for the plan of an ‘ideal’ appraisal framework. That is, in the event that is centered on execution evaluation with the end goal of execution improvement, there are sure qualities of the examination framework that would be alluring; and these are not really similar attributes that have been found in most of the researches. It can be understood once more, that presentation improvement is an element of numerous elements other than the idea of the evaluation framework itself. The inspirational system proposed here is an endeavor to recognize the more significant factors that are instrumental in fortifying the firm and coming about inspiration to improve the appraisal process. This model proposes a somewhat straightforward and straightforward evaluation framework. Such a framework would bring about appraisals that are effortlessly clarified and perceived, and lead to impression of more noteworthy equity and reasonableness (Rusu, Avasilcai & Hutu, 2016). It is essential to have employees’ contribution to the advancement of any appraising instruments to explain representative comprehension of the evaluations and to improve view of procedural equity. An evaluation framework dependent on the persuasive system would likewise incorporate clear explanations of guidelines and desires, so everybody included would comprehend what is normal and what is compensated (Bayo-Moriones, Galdon-Sanchez & Martinez-de-Morentin, 2020). Such suggestions are predictable with those proposed by the ‘non-conventional’ examination frameworks talked about prior. The incorporation of ‘by and large execution’ appraisals and the utilization of independent evaluations for criticism and dynamic purposes ought to likewise make the measure simpler to clarify and comprehend. More regular assessments and input help workers to perceive how they are improving, and this should build their inspiration to improve further (Rusu, Avasilcai & Hutu, 2016). While it is improbable that firms like Nestle would lead formal evaluations any more than a few times per year, we would propose that casual examinations and criticism be a standard aspect of the framework. It can be further recommended that appraisal criticism ought to remember data for how to improve execution, alongside data about what regions of execution need improvement. The recurrence of criticism is significant in spite of the fact that this has not been underscored much in the examination related with appraisal evaluation. Ultimately, the rating scales should zero in on results as much as on measures. This is reliable with the perspective on objective based examination frameworks, and ought to be steady with more extensive hierarchical destinations (Upadhyay, Ansari & Bijalwan, 2019). Another proposal is that these outcomes ought to be heavily influenced by the employee so as to be assessed in additionally steady way with the perspective on advocates of objective based evaluations.
Summary
Nestle Malaysia is among the best performing companies in the country and has achieved this through a well programmed performance appraisal. Through appraisal program, the firm has been able to improve its overall performance even more by motivating good performing workers by awarding them promotion or monetary incentives. From the program, the firm has been able to accomplish effectiveness such as communication which has greatly improved the performance of the firm. Communication is improved as the gap between the employees and the management is bridged through constant and meaningful discussions. The firm has also improved the awarding process as the awards are given to individuals in accordance to their performance. More so, the process has improved the professionalism through motivation of the workers to work harder and offering some additional training. The three key techniques that have been used in performance appraisal include the Management by objectives (MBO), which includes all the stakeholders involved to come up with proper strategies on how to improve employee performance in line with the organizational objectives. Another technique is the rating scale which has score card measures as per the employee’s performance attributes. The 360 degree feedback technique involves an employee receiving performance evaluation from all the people he is interacting with. To have an effective performance appraisal plan, the program has to involve contribution from the employees as they are the primary stakeholders in the appraisal process. The performance appraisal programed need to be regularly performed to increase its chances of success. Furthermore, employees are key advocates in the program and their opinions during the discussions needs to be highly considered and the issues worked out for a better performance.
References
Islami, X., Mulolli, E., & Mustafa, N. (2018). Using Management by Objectives as a performance appraisal tool for employee satisfaction. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 94-108.
Ashfaq, M. (2019). Managing by Objectives (MBO) and Government Agencies: A Critical Review.
Hosain, S. (2016). 360 Degree Feedback as a Technique of Performance Appraisal: Does it Really Work? Asian Business Review, 6(1).
Kanaslan, E. K., & Iyem, C. (2016). Is 360 Degree Feedback Appraisal an Effective Way of Performance Evaluation? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(5), 172-182.
Sahni, D. (2019). New Vistas of Performance Appraisal in Current Era.
Rusu, G., Avasilcai, S., & Hutu, C. A. (2016). Employee performance appraisal: A conceptual framework. Annals of the University of Oradea, Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering, 2, 53-58.
Bayo-Moriones, A., Galdon-Sanchez, J. E., & Martinez-de-Morentin, S. (2020). Business strategy, performance appraisal and organizational results. Personnel Review.
Upadhyay, R. K., Ansari, K. R., & Bijalwan, P. (2019). Performance Appraisal and Team Effectiveness: A Moderated Mediation Model of Employee Retention and Employee Satisfaction. Vision, 0972262919875542.
Islami, X., Mulolli, E., & Mustafa, N. (2018). Using Management by Objectives as a performance appraisal tool for employee satisfaction. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 94-108.
Pattanayak, B. (2020). Human resource management. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd…
Bursamalaysia.com. (2019). Annual report 2019.
Nestle.com. (2020). Good Food, Good Life.
